SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Delaney, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Keeping the Unit Safe: The Anatomy of Escalation

Mary E. Johnson

Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, mary_e_johnson@rush .edu

Kathleen R. Delaney

Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, IL

BACKGROUND: Escalation has been depicted as a linear trajectory of behavioral eruption beginning with agitation and proceeding until the patient is out of control. This notion has influenced current descriptions of de-escalation strategies. OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to understand the context and conditions that influence how nursing staffs manage patients who are escalating out of control. DESIGN: Methods consistent with grounded theory were used to collect and analyze the data. Patient—staff interactions were observed for more than 400 hours on inpatient units. Sixteen staff members and 12 patients were interviewed. FINDINGS: Data analysis revealed a nonlinear process of escalation and de-escalation. Two conditions that influenced strategies used by staff members were the type and the trajectory of escalation. This report focuses on patterns of patient escalation. CONCLUSION: The data revealed a complex escalation and de-escalation process that necessitates ongoing assessments of patient status and the milieu and individualizing staff responses. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc, 2007; 13(1), 42-52.

Key Words: escalation • psychiatric nursing • safety • aggression • de-escalation • grounded theory

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, Vol. 13, No. 1, 42-52 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1078390307301736


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement