SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamera, E.
Right arrow Articles by Burris-Fish, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reciprocity Between Individuals With Severe and Persistent Mental Illness and Their Family Members

Edna Hamera

School of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City

Ann Kuckelman Cobb

School of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City

Jamey L. Burris-Fish

Community Mental Health Center of Crawford County, Kansas

BACKGROUND: The focus of research on families of the severely and persistently mentally ill is on unidirectional caregivingfromfamily members to the ill individual (consumer). It seldom addresses whether the consumer also gives something to the family. Thus the concept of reciprocity was investigated in this context.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to identify differences in families who report ed reciprocity from consumers with those who did not and to describe the kinds of rec iprocity perceived by these families.

DESIGN: The objectives were met with the use of responses from a mailed questionnaire to family members.

RESULTS: Reciprocity was reported more by women than men, by respondents who lived with the consumer, and by families who reported giving more assistance to the con sumer and who perceived the consumer as higher functioning. Neither age of family member or consumer nor type of family relationship was related to reciprocity. The kinds of reciprocity families perceived were categorized into instrumental tasks, caring, family solidarity, self-caring, peace of mind, family sensitization, and financial. CONCLUSION: The findings support the importance of planning nursing interventions that recognize that the severely and persistently mentally ill may give to their families as well as receivefrom them. (J Am Psychiatric Nurses Assoc [1998]. 4, 182-189)

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, Vol. 4, No. 6, 182-189 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/107839039800400602


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement