This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chiverton, P. Articles by Walker, P. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bridging the Gap Between Psychiatric Hospitalization and Community Care: Cost and Quality Outcomes

University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, NY 14642.

Donna Tortoretti, RNC, BSN

University of Rochester School of Nursing in Rochester, New York

Marylee La Forest, RN, MS

University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, New York.

Patricia Hinton Walker, RN, PhD, FAAN

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver, Colorado

BACKGROUND: Current changes in the health care system require the development of interventions that reduce length of stay and provide alternatives to hospitalization while maintaining quality and consumer satisfaction

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to (a) investigate differences in quality indicators for patients receiving case management services; (b) measure satisfaction of patients enrolled in the case management intervention; and (c) reduce costs related to high utilization of services as a result of recidivism and rehospitalization.

STUDY DESIGN: Inpatients were randomly assigned to either an intervention (n = 121) or control group (n = 122). The intervention group received transitional case management services; the control group received traditional care.

RESULTS: No differences were found between the two groups on the Beck Depression Inventory or the Mini-Mental Status Examination. Ninety-six percent of the patients and 95% of their caregivers were very pleased with the case management intervention Fewer patients in the intervention group (9 vs. 16 in the control group) were readmitted to the hospital over the course of the project. Similarly, only 1 patient in the intervention group versus 18 patients in the control group used the emergency department. Even considering the cost of providing case management services, an overall savings of $175,375 occurredfor the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS: Transitional case management services maintained quality and reduced costs with a high level of consumer satisfaction.

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, Vol. 5, No. 2, 46-53 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/107839039900500204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?